-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Media Queries 4 #154
Comments
In practice, this has significant overlap with #141, as that is one of the most significant parts of MQ4. |
I think it is best to see this mostly separate from #141. There aren't that many tests for media queries and no single browser scores really well. |
A lot of the Firefox failures at least are down to w3c/csswg-drafts#7595, where it seems like different people interpreted the spec differently. I don't think there's necessarily a large number of discrete bugs here. But yeah, there's definitely still more work to be done here above and beyond range syntax. Just, like, it's worthwhile knowing there are both proposals. And that may have implications if one or both are accepted (e.g., one could imagine if both are accepted we just have a singular "Media Queries" focus area). |
I would like that :) I plan to focus for a while on bits of |
@gsnedders Just to be sure that I am not overlooking anything. There are two sections with tests that are focussed on
correct? |
I highly doubt we want all of these, but:
|
Thank you for that list and the command to generate it! Hehe, wasn't asking to include all of them for the purpose of interop 2023 :) |
Survey results for range media queries, which is part of Media Queries Level 4, have been posted to #141 (comment). |
@lilles has helped me review the Chrome failures in https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries?label=master&label=experimental&aligned We'd like to exclude:
Additional test review might turn up more things. |
I am also adding more tests like this one : web-platform-tests/wpt#36911 |
I didn't look closely at the features mentioned above, but after looking a bit closer, |
@romainmenke thanks for adding those tests! I've reviewed, merged and also have labeled them. A link to all labeled tests to follow... |
Thank you for proposing Media Queries 4 for inclusion in Interop 2023. We are pleased to let you know that this proposal was accepted as the Media Queries 4 focus area. You can follow the progress of this Focus Area on the Interop 2023 dashboard. For an overview of our process, see the proposal selection summary. Thank you for contributing to Interop 2023! Posted on behalf of the Interop team. |
Really excited about this! |
Description
I was working on an updated fallback for
@custom-media
and was surprised to find that there are subtle and unexpected differences between browsers when it comes to@media
.There are many failing WPT tests across all browsers but some examples :
((orientation))
or
support :(orientation) or (orientation)
Rationale
It is not trivial for users to figure out which
@media
features are supported in all browsers.Aligning supported features across browsers at the same time will aid in adoption of some the new features.
Specification
https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/
Tests
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: