release: v0.5.0 proposal #4821
Merged
release: v0.5.0 proposal #4821
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
team
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
…Future.newResolver` (#5089) * refactor(rspack_core): remove nodejs_resolver * feat: remove `experiments.rspackFuture.newResolver`
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
* wip * feat: normalModule loader hook (#5065) * feat: normal-module-loader hook * fix --------- Co-authored-by: ahabhgk <[email protected]> * fix * typo * fix test * fix --------- Co-authored-by: Fy <[email protected]>
h-a-n-a
force-pushed
the
0.5.0
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7905b37
to
dc80a19
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
!eco-ci |
|
!bench |
|
📝 Benchmark detail: Open
|
|
!canary |
|
0.4.5-canary-be59383-20240105051840 |
feat: add remoteInitOptions on initContainer params
* chore: force create-rspack use publish version * fix * fix --------- Co-authored-by: ahabhgk <[email protected]>
#5260) * fix: not enable rspack-plugin-react-refresh when mode set to 'production' * chore: update test case * fix --------- Co-authored-by: ahabhgk <[email protected]>
|
!eco-ci |
|
Seems like we haven't change the version in templates of |
|
it will automatically update the version in template now https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/pull/5261/files#diff-238099b4330f0cc69c2eaf26f617b5fb51b872e25511b2691ed81ab98ab64986 |
Reelase Packages:0.5.0 Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ahabhgk
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
0.4.x Deprecate Changes
0.5.0 Breaking Changes
experiments.rspackFuture.newResolver#5089 @BoshenrspackFuture.disableApplyEntryLazily: trueby default refactor: enable disableApplyEntryLazily by default #5179 @ahabhgkdevServer.hotfrom core, dev-server should apply HotModuleReplacementPlugin manually refactor: replace devServer.hot by HotModuleReplacementPlugin #5193 @ahabhgkbuiltins.noEmitAssets,builtins.presetEnv,builtins.decorator,builtins.devFriendlySplitChunks,builtins.react,builtins.pluginImport,builtins.emotion,builtins.relay,builtins.html,builtins.copy,builtins.minifyOptionsrefactor: remove deprecated builtins options #5207 @ahabhgkHighlight
Performance Regression Check
Test Plan
Require Documentation?