New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use (int,int) instead of double for efficient serialization #113

Open

wavewave opened this issue Jul 12, 2020 · 1 comment

Labels

Owner

wavewave commented Jul 12, 2020

internally use efficient number: say (Word16, Word8) = (n,m) ~ n + m / 256 for coordinate value.

wavewave added the new feature label

Owner Author

wavewave commented Jul 12, 2020

For compatibility, it is better to have n + m / 100, and does not use m > 100.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment