This component reflects the system to be authorized.
+A proper SSP should reference this correctly within a given statement to document implemented requirements per FedRAMP requirements.
+This example SSP does not do that, it's invalid and has some problems.
+Implementation of controls for the System to be Authorized
+This component reference would be valid if it was within the statement
above, but it is not.
This constraint violation for the invalid file should warn users and developers repurposing valid syntax for NIST's upstream OSCAL generic use cases is not valid specifically for FedRAMP.
+NIST maintains OSCAL models that allow implemented requirements for controls to have references to the implementing components in multiple locations to support multiple use cases.
+Despite the flexibility of NIST's upstream OSCAL models, FedRAMP only accepts OSCAL-based SSP with the reference in one of those locations, see missing-response-components
for more details about this requirement.
A constraint violation with this warning indicates a given SSP uses one of the valid locations for all NIST use cases, not the only one FedRA
+