-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dx Station sends full exchange after user sends partial callsign #382
Comments
My response back to groups.io... Hi Tim, Thank you for clarifying. I found the code that is causing the problem. It is happening about 50% of the time - sometimes with the caller is sending the corrected call being sent twice and sometimes only once along with the full exchange. I also notice that the calling station should only send their exchange when the user sends his exchange first. I realize the bug is the calling station is sending their exchange before the user has sent their exchange. In this reported case, the F5 key is sending the partial call without an exchange. Thus, the caller should only send their corrected call without an exchange. This behavior change (in 1.85) was motivated by the following article: http://www.k1usn.com/Do%27s%20and%20Don%27ts%20and%20More.pdf To quote this article (Italics added):
I will study this further and either find a fix or reduce the percentage. Perhaps 50% is too much. 73 Mike W7SST |
This issue occurred while fixing #315. This original fix did not distinguish between the user sending either
In both cases, the DxStation was sending their corrected callsign along with their full exchange. This was occurring for both cases above. The DxStation should send their callsign and exchange when the user sends the partial callsign along with their exchange. When the user sends only a partial callsign, the DxStation should respond with only their callsign. |
This issue was fixed with merge #384.
|
Description
Tim, N0UI, reported this issue on groups.io...
My response...
Sean, N3RTW, added...
And finally Tim's response to my question...
Version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: