Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Update Avalanche comparison #5548

Open
gonzaloetjo opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Update Avalanche comparison #5548

gonzaloetjo opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
docs Related to the docs in general.

Comments

@gonzaloetjo
Copy link

gonzaloetjo commented Jan 29, 2024

Request: Update the Message Passing section of the Avalanche comparison . AWM has been deployed in Avalanche for a while, and it would be appropriate to update the section accordingly.

The end result should have a clear and concise description of AWM and how it compares with XCMP / HRMP.

Here some documentation about it:

Alternative: Declare that this section has to be updated.

I would like to try to take on this issue if possible.

@gonzaloetjo gonzaloetjo added the docs Related to the docs in general. label Jan 29, 2024
@DrW3RK
Copy link
Member

DrW3RK commented Jan 29, 2024

@gonzaloetjo, please feel free to create a PR to make these updates.

@ayomidebajo
Copy link
Contributor

I could take on this issue if it hasn't been fixed.

@gonzaloetjo
Copy link
Author

I could take on this issue if it hasn't been fixed.

I have Avalanche part mid done. The issue is XCMP is not advanced and details are quite unclear, so i'm trying to gain more information there. AWM compares better against XCMP imo.

@ayomidebajo
Copy link
Contributor

You can learn more about XCMP here

@gonzaloetjo
Copy link
Author

gonzaloetjo commented Mar 27, 2024

Thanks @ayomidebajo. I saw that document though. While it has a lot of information, there's not much on XCMP, only one paragraph with not much detail.

There's more information here. Specifically information added in this commit: de4ffb4. I still think there's information lacking, but it's good enough for an initial presentation. There's also an article linked, but it dates to 2020 and I think lots has changed since.

If it's ok with you I'll use only this information, commit and we can see to fix it from there. I'll do it after this weekend though.

@ayomidebajo
Copy link
Contributor

You're welcome!
Take all the time you need. I'll take up another issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Related to the docs in general.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants