-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why is progressbar mentioned in F103? #892
Comments
I'm assuming the use of progressbar in F103 would be because you could consider a loading message as a status message, therefore the page should not fail if that has been added. Pinging @mbgower as he created this technique. |
The ARIA specification names all roles with implicit Live Region. |
I am not sure what the change should be, but I did want to affirm that progress bars were one of the examples of “auto-updating information” we had in mind when 2.2.2 was written. |
Just remove the list entry "role=progressbar" from the list because it is not a live region |
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F103
Progressbar in F103 is listed as a live region, but it is not a live region: https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#progressbar
Even worse: a progressbar can never be turned into a live region, because the change of the value of the progressbar does not affect any output in a live region (according to the specification of live regions)
See also: w3c/aria-practices#1165
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: