From 367976d44a97e6f1bd140da3d366a6f9bed0cebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kathy Eng Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:15:04 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Apply suggestions from code review --- act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs b/act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs index 071de05..e4d8c71 100644 --- a/act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs +++ b/act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ A rule was designed to test a minimum accessibility requirement and there exists **Scenario 2**: the rule's failed outcomes require further testing for the accessibility requirement -A rule was designed to test a specific type of solution for an accessibility requirement, but the rule does not cover all solutions that can be used to meet the requirement. In this scenario, the rule's failed outcomes cannot determine that an accessibility requirement is not satisfied because further testing is needed. The rule’s passed outcomes can determine that an accessibility requirement is satisfied. The accessibility requirement is a Secondary requirement. +A rule was designed to test a specific type of solution for an accessibility requirement, but the rule does not cover all solutions that can be used to meet the requirement. In this scenario, the rule’s failed outcomes cannot determine that an accessibility requirement is not satisfied because further testing is needed. The rule’s passed outcomes can determine that an accessibility requirement is satisfied. The accessibility requirement is a Secondary requirement.