Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to document on formal objection processing #337

Closed
samuelweiler opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Link to document on formal objection processing #337

samuelweiler opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@samuelweiler
Copy link
Member

Add an in-line informative reference to: https://www.w3.org/2017/12/formal-objections.html

(Alternatively, deprecate that document.)

@dwsinger dwsinger added this to the Process 2021 or later milestone Feb 17, 2020
@frivoal frivoal modified the milestones: Process 2021, Deferred Mar 11, 2020
@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor

astonishingly, the process says nothing at all about processing FOs, only about recording and reporting them. We probably need a short section somewhere.

I'd rather not deprecate; when we go Dir-Free, we'll need an improved version of this.

@jeffjaffe
Copy link

For Director-free, the AB has been working on a draft improved version of this: https://www.w3.org/2019/06/W3C%20Council%20guidelines%20for%20formal-objections.html

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented May 10, 2021

@samuelweiler, The whole handling of formal objections is being reconsidered, in order to figure out how to make it work in a director-free w3c. In the present state of things, the suggestion you're making here seems reasonable, but I am not sure we want to draw attention to things that are about to change, so I'd rather defer this issue. Are you ok with that?

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Sep 23, 2022

Closing as out of scope in favor of w3c/Guide#166

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants