We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0018.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2016JulSep/0039.html
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes
No. (Some autolinks may have changed to a more recent version of that module, but these can all be downgraded as needed.)
No
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2016
None
No. Presumably more bugs have been fixed...
Open to suggestions, CSSWG continues to accept comments always.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please publish this together with css-values-4 FPWD if that is reasonably convenient.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Transition approved.
Kudos to the editors for the level of detail and citation in the Changes section.
Preliminary publication request sent 8 Aug. Doing Com Team announcement now.
Document published.
swickr
No branches or pull requests
Link to group's decision to request transition
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0018.html
Link to previous Candidate Recommendation transition request
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2016JulSep/0039.html
Substantive changes
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes
Any changes in normative references?
No. (Some autolinks may have changed to a more recent version of that module, but these can all be downgraded as needed.)
Any changes in requirements?
No
Wide Review of substantive changes
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2016
Issues status
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2016
Formal Objections
None
Any changes in implementation information?
No. Presumably more bugs have been fixed...
Deadline for further comments
Open to suggestions, CSSWG continues to accept comments always.
Any changes in patent disclosures?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: