You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If, after the deadline for nominations, the number of nominees is:
Greater than or equal to the minimum number of available seats and less than or equal to the maximum number of available seats, those nominees are thereby elected. ...
Less than the minimum number of available seats, Calls for Nominations are issued until a sufficient number of people have been nominated.
Simplifying this, if there are not enough candidates, we extend the nomination period; but if there are exactly enough, we don't run an election.
It's been suggested that we should extend the nomination period when there are exactly enough candidates, in order to ensure that there is an election. Should we do this, or not?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's come up several times over the years, but I think we never actually filed a Process issue on it:
Section 3.3.3.3 https://www.w3.org/policies/process/drafts/#AB-TAG-elections states:
Simplifying this, if there are not enough candidates, we extend the nomination period; but if there are exactly enough, we don't run an election.
It's been suggested that we should extend the nomination period when there are exactly enough candidates, in order to ensure that there is an election. Should we do this, or not?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: