-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
[a11y TF] ambiguous notation
As per minutes to the TF meeting on 2018-08-28, the TF wants to gather examples of ambiguous notation.
Fraction-like notation look similar to a vertically stacked fraction notation. They are usually created in equation authoring systems using constructs based off of fraction. A typical example is MathML's mfrac
element and TeX's \over
, although tables might be used for stacking the elements in some of the notations shown.
Example:
The numerator and denominator can be any expression and can nest.
Note: fractions might be spoken in many different ways, particularly for numeric fractions such as . Another special case is rates, such as ("kilometers per second").
Example:
Technically, this is very similar to the meaning for a fraction but the diagonal ellipsis is what makes it technically not a regular fraction.
There are a number of alternative notations. For example Pringsheim:
and Abramowitz and Stegun:
Example:
The top and bottom can be any expression and can nest, but nesting is very rare. Typically, they are relatively simple expressions.
These typically are generated as either a fraction with a zero-width fraction line enclosed in parens that stretch or as a 2x1 table/ 2 column vector (enclosed in parens that stretch)
Example:
The denominator should be a prime, which means typically it is either a prime integer or a variable (possibly subscripted) that represents a prime. Potentially, it could be an expression, but that would be very rare.
Note that because the Legendre symbol is an expression, it can be raised to a power as shown in the Jacobi symbol example below.
Example:
The example includes Legendre symbols on the right, which represents the prime factorization of n. Hence, knowing which is the Jacobi symbol and which is the Legendre symbol requires knowing with a number is prime and/or with a symbol represents a prime.
Examples:
- ,
- ,
- ,
Total and partial derivatives can be written in several different notations. The Leibniz notation uses the fraction notation shown above. The function/variable being differentiated can be in the numerator or can appear after the fraction (second example). Higher order derivatives use superscripts on the 'd'/'∂' and on the variables of differentiation (second and fourth examples).
Because the differential d operator can be confused with a variable named d, the Unicode value U+2146 (ⅆ) might be used instead of d.
Example:
More examples and an explanation of this notation: Wikipedia
Example:
2 row vectors/2x1 matrices may use parens or brackets to surround the fraction like notation. As noted above, with parens, these are identical notation to the binomial notation.
Authors usually do not differentiate between square roots, generic roots and the radical sign. Usually, they will use notation for square roots, e.g., check the notation used near "radical sign" at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nth_root.
Equational content often omits implict operations which are supposed to be derived from the context. While Unicode provides such tools as invisible times or invisible function operation, these are often missing in real life content.
- multiplication
- e.g., ab + c vs id + c
- function application
- e.g., (f+g)(x) vs (f+g)(h)