Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations 2024-12-04 > 2025-02-04 #252

Closed
1 task
xfq opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
IETF Internet-Draft or RFC review REVIEW REQUESTED WD Working draft. Not yet approaching CR.

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Dec 4, 2024

Name of your specification

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations

URL of your specification

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis/

Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?

  • My specification includes an Internationalization Considerations section

When does the review need to be finished?

N/A

What has changed since any previous review?

No response

Please point to the results of your own self-review

No response

Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?

Comments go to the authors ([email protected] and [email protected]), [email protected], and the IESG ([email protected]).

Pointer to any explainer for the spec

No response

Other comments

No response

@xfq xfq added REVIEW REQUESTED WD Working draft. Not yet approaching CR. pending The WG needs to assign a reviewer. labels Dec 4, 2024
@aphillips aphillips added the IETF Internet-Draft or RFC review label Dec 4, 2024
@aphillips aphillips moved this from Review requested to In review in Internationalization (I18N) Horizontal Review RADAR Dec 5, 2024
@aphillips aphillips removed the pending The WG needs to assign a reviewer. label Dec 12, 2024
@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Dec 16, 2024

I have reviewed this document and didn't find any issues.

The profitability of domain names and the decision-making and responsibilities of registries were discussed, and there were no changes to the IDNA protocols. Security issues and additional contextual rules by zones were also discussed.

There are also some errata about Unicode in this document. They look good to me.

@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

Completed, no issues found, @xfq to write to mnot/et al and jck to notify

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IETF Internet-Draft or RFC review REVIEW REQUESTED WD Working draft. Not yet approaching CR.
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants