[css-images] 1D "painting area" for stripes() is confusing

[Loirooriol]

stripes() keeps referring to a "painting area", e.g.

a <percentage> is relative to the painting area

But this is very confusing since an area is 2D but stripes() is a <1d-image>. And for example,

width: 0;
height: 0;
border: 50px solid;
border-radius: 100%;
border-color: stripes(blue 50%, orange 50%);

I think it would look like the image below, so the actual areas are in a proportion of 1:4, not 1:1

I think "painting area" should be renamed to something like "length of the paint line".

[SebastianZ]

I agree that "painting area" sounds confusing, though @fantasai already changed that term to "total width". So I guess this issue can already be closed.

Sebastian

[Loirooriol]

a71367a That's good, but I'm now it seems that each consumer of <image-1D> should define both the paint line and the total width. Maybe just define the total width as the length of the paint line?

[SebastianZ]

Maybe just define the total width as the length of the paint line?

I did just that now in #10777.

Sebastian