From d25027bdd31c71f75f9cdc726704163c3bdc6128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fantasai Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:07:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [css-images-3] Ambiguous image URLs that are fragment-only URLs aren't treated as . #383 --- css-images-3/Overview.bs | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/css-images-3/Overview.bs b/css-images-3/Overview.bs index abef02d9878..ed160dc7746 100644 --- a/css-images-3/Overview.bs +++ b/css-images-3/Overview.bs @@ -176,7 +176,9 @@ Image References: the ''url()'' notation {#url-notation} An ambiguous image URL is a <> value that can be interpreted as either an <> or an element reference. - If an [=ambiguous image URL=] has a fragment + If an [=ambigous image URL=] is a [[css-values-3#local-urls|fragment-only URL]], + then it must be treated as an element reference. + Otherwise, if the [=ambiguous image URL=] has a fragment that references an element in the resource that is an appropriate type of element for the context in which the <> appears (such as a <{mask}> element for the 'mask-image' property),