Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARIA projects should include lint traps: white space, etc #1934

Closed
cookiecrook opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

ARIA projects should include lint traps: white space, etc #1934

cookiecrook opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
editorial a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo
Milestone

Comments

@cookiecrook
Copy link
Contributor

ARIA projects should include lint traps: white space, etc

I noticed a lot of the ARIA projects have inconsistent spacing:

  • EOL white space
  • Tabs vs spaces in different specs
  • Sometimes tabs vs spaces in the same doc, or even leading with a mixture in the same line.

It’d be useful to set up a linter (like WPT’s) for whitespace and other nitpicks.

Note: I don’t care whether it’s spaces or tabs, as long as it’s consistent.

@cookiecrook cookiecrook added the editorial a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo label May 15, 2023
@cookiecrook
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like @nschonni may have some or all of this already in: w3c/aria-common#49

@pkra pkra self-assigned this Jun 28, 2023
@pkra pkra added this to the ARIA 1.3 milestone Jun 28, 2023
@pkra
Copy link
Member

pkra commented Jun 28, 2023

Latest experiment: w3c/graphics-aria#10

@pkra
Copy link
Member

pkra commented Nov 6, 2023

Closing this in favor of w3c/aria-common#99

@pkra pkra closed this as completed Nov 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants