Traceable Presentation Recipient

[OR13]

Today he have the following relations in the vc data model:

issuer -> issues -> credential -> presents -> holder

holder -> presents -> verifier

Due to the nature of verifiable presentation, the holder is known but the verifier is only loosely identified via domain or aud.

What if we allows for the holder to specify a concrete recipient?

{
  "@context": [
    "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1",
    "https://w3id.org/traceability/v1"
  ],
  "id": "urn:uuid:3978344f-8596-4c3a-a978-8fcaba3903c5",
  "type":
  [
    "VerifiablePresentation",
    "TraceablePresentation"
  ],
  "workflow": {
    "definition": [
      "urn:uuid:n1552885-cc91-4bb3-91f1-5466a0be084e" 
    ],
    "instance": [
      "urn:uuid:f5fb6ce4-b0b1-41b8-89b0-331ni58b7ee0"
    ],
  },
  "holder":{
    "id":"did:web:sender.example",
    "type":"Organization",
    "location":{
       "type":"Place",
       "geo":{
          "type":"GeoCoordinates",
          "latitude":"68.7083",
          "longitude":"4.6377"
       },
       "address":{
          "type":"PostalAddress",
          "organizationName":"Ratke - Bergstrom",
          "streetAddress":"21851 Ima Heights",
          "addressLocality":"O'Connellborough",
          "addressRegion":"Missouri",
          "postalCode":"65587",
          "addressCountry":"Cyprus"
       }
    }
 },
 // new verifiable presentation property ...  a full graph node for the "aud" concept.
 "recipient": {
   "id":"did:web:receiver.example",
 }
}

[OR13]

Its possible the VC WG will define a term that works for this in V2: w3c/vc-data-model#902 (comment)

If they don't we can define this term as being scoped to TraceablePresentation type.

[nissimsan]

Awaiting outcome of the discussion VC2.0 #902 how to progress this.

[nissimsan]

This makes "business sense" to me. Like the "To" in an email.
We could keep it optional.

[OR13]

I suggest closing this issue, there is no implementer interest.

[nissimsan]

Closing.