-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show OGN/FLARM traffic? #88
Comments
You could try checking that VRS is connecting properly and that messages are getting through - but TBH looking at your screenshot it looks like the thing you're using for gliders isn't giving the gliders an ICAO-compliant identifier; i.e. a 24 bit numeric ID, ideally out of one of the unused ranges if it's going to be faked. VRS will reject messages that don't have a valid ICAO on them. |
Thanks! Is there a reference which ICAO-IDs are compliant? From the screenshot, it think the ID was "~114102". I have seen OGN/FLARM traffic with an ICAO-ID too, but other use their FLARM-ID (but in the aircraft-list of the OGN receiver). I have to cross-check if that traffic is shown in VRS. But the (I think) they are FLARM-IDs like ~114102 never show up). |
The ICAO ID (aka the Mode-S identifier) is a 24 bit number usually expressed as a six digit hexadecimal number. Zero is not valid, so the range in hex is 000001 to FFFFFF. The two obvious issues with a 7 digit ID that starts with tilde is that tilde isn't a hex digit and the ID is too long. I don't know which one specifically causes VRS to reject it as invalid without checking the code, but I would have thought the length is probably going to be checked first. |
Hi,
I have installed ogn2dump1090 (https://github.com/b3nn0/ogn2dump1090) and in tar1090 the OGN-traffics shows up as MLAT. But the traffic is not shown in VRS. ogn2dump1090 injects the traffic via beast-in 30004 (b3nn0/ogn2dump1090#6 (comment)). I assume it will go out via beast-out 30005, which VRS listens on, but nothing.
Example:
FLARM-Raw:
FLR114102 [ 20/ 112sec] 7:2:114102 F* < 9.3m/s> < 7.4dB>, <1.1bit/packet>, < +8.13(0.13)kHz> +1.1dB@10km(42)
113405: [ +47.49687, +11.16419]deg 1429m -1.5m/s 10.3m/s 111.1deg -9.8deg/s 7m5 15x26m Fn:01f__ +8.32kHz 2.8/18.5dB/2 7e 4.8km 091.3deg +8.4deg *
tar1090:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: