You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by rwaffen April 4, 2024
initially I named the git repo container-puppetserver / container-puppetdb. this was to make sure it is not confused with the real git projects from puppet and make sure you can see that this only is for container builds.
but so also the package/container image itself is called that way. but recently i found out, that this has not to be like that.
the image name now voxpupuli/container-puppetserver:latest
shot name: voxpupuli/puppetserver:latest
so we could build a package only called puppetserver and add it to the registry. the question is now: do we want to do this? do we want to rename it or add a second package/image with the short name?
or do we just keep the names now?
any suggestions?
as discussed we can use the shorter names
create shortname dockerhub repos
add short name to github
push also to shortname docker repos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would recommend to keep the long name and add the short name.
Next we can make an announcement, that we switch names and can afterwards remove the long names.
This will give users the option to migrate over time.
Discussed in #42
Originally posted by rwaffen April 4, 2024
initially I named the git repo container-puppetserver / container-puppetdb. this was to make sure it is not confused with the real git projects from puppet and make sure you can see that this only is for container builds.
but so also the package/container image itself is called that way. but recently i found out, that this has not to be like that.
the image name now
voxpupuli/container-puppetserver:latest
shot name:
voxpupuli/puppetserver:latest
so we could build a package only called puppetserver and add it to the registry. the question is now: do we want to do this? do we want to rename it or add a second package/image with the short name?
or do we just keep the names now?
any suggestions?
as discussed we can use the shorter names
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: