-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 973
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[good first issue]add relative unit testcase for merged PRs #3075
Comments
/good-first-issue |
@lowang-bh: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hello, I am hoping to start with this good first issue on Volcano. Could it be assigned to me? |
/assign @MondayCha |
@MondayCha Hi, do you still work on this? Could you assign to me? I'm ready to add some UTs to start at volcano. |
/assign @JesseStutler |
I think the current testing framework's scalability is a bit poor...Like I want to add UT in reclaim action, I want to build a pod with preemptionPolicy with pod, I need to add a function based on BuildPod, but now the parameter list of BuildPod is a bit too long: volcano/pkg/scheduler/util/test_utils.go Line 57 in 0843c0d
I don’t know what the parameters in which position are used for. On the contrary, the way of writing in the k8s repository is clearer: It is better to expand the fields in this way. Now it is difficult for BuildPod to expand the fields, parameter list will be longer and longer... |
What would you like to be added:
Add UT to cover the pod's condition message in allocate/preempt/reclaim/backfill action, according to relative issues and PRs as following.
Why is this needed:
To prevent future changes cause new issue and breaking current fix.
The origin idea is from issue #3049
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: