You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What steps did you take and what happened:
See kubernetes/kubernetes#82664 for some context; lots of conversations in slack.
TL;DR; we may allow some conformance tests to be also disruptive; specifically there are some w.r.t. taints that were causing evictions on a node and impacting sonobuoy. We need to tolerate these taints (or all taints?) in order to be sure that we do not get evicted during a test run.
What did you expect to happen:
Sonobuoy MUST be able to run all conformance tests (and, ideally, all of the e2e suite); not get evicted due to a taint added during a test.
A new conformance test in v1.16 will add a taint to a node which
can impact the sonobuoy aggregator pod as well as the e2e pod.
This change adds the toleration to both the default job podspec
and the aggregator. The default daemonset podspec already tolerates
all taints.
Fixes#876
Signed-off-by: John Schnake <[email protected]>
What steps did you take and what happened:
See kubernetes/kubernetes#82664 for some context; lots of conversations in slack.
TL;DR; we may allow some conformance tests to be also disruptive; specifically there are some w.r.t. taints that were causing evictions on a node and impacting sonobuoy. We need to tolerate these taints (or all taints?) in order to be sure that we do not get evicted during a test run.
What did you expect to happen:
Sonobuoy MUST be able to run all conformance tests (and, ideally, all of the e2e suite); not get evicted due to a taint added during a test.
Environment:
kubectl version
): v1.16.0.beta.3The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: