-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 707
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate CI to Github actions #4436
Comments
In the meantime, we could start splitting some logic into some container images, as Rafa suggested (see #5177 (review)) |
The first iteration of the migration has been completed with the merge of the first version of the new workflow, which includes those jobs that are run for every single push of a branch: test, build images, push images, run e2e tests, and sync from/to Bitnami chart (all but those that belong to the |
Great work @beni0888 !!! |
Awesome @beni0888! |
To be able to report the SRP source provenance from GHA, we need to generate and ask for the registration of a new SRP UID. I have filed this ticket in Jira Service Desk for that. |
According to the activity in the Jira Ticket, our request has been fulfilled and the new SRP UID has been registered, so we should be able to report the source provenance from GHA. |
Signed-off-by: Jesús Benito Calzada <[email protected]> <!-- Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated: - Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. - Describe any known limitations with your change. - Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code. Thank you for contributing! --> ### Description of the change This PR fixes a typo in the call to `srp provenance source` command in the GHA's `srp-source-provenance` action. ### Benefits A typo in the call to a command is removed, so it should work as expected now. ### Possible drawbacks None. <!-- Describe any known limitations with your change --> ### Applicable issues <!-- Enter any applicable Issues here (You can reference an issue using #) --> - related to #4436 Signed-off-by: Jesús Benito Calzada <[email protected]>
I have confirmed with the SRP team that we are already properly reporting the source provenance from the GHA pipeline 🎉 |
Nice - looks like you've completed everything other than the easy parts of just switching circle CI off and docs! Well done @beni0888 |
I've been working on fixing some minor issues that were preventing the |
The PRs with the decommission of CircleCI and the documentation update have been merged. Besides that, I have a couple of ideas to simplify the workflow, better said, to simplify the branch protection rules:
But I think that could be tackle in separate issues, so we can finally close this one |
I've configured the Kubeapps project in CircleCI to stop building this repo. Should we also completely remove the Kubeapps project from CircleCI? |
Description:
Move CI to Github actions
Related to #4096
Progress
README.md
fileFull Integration Pipeline
on scheduleREADME.md
DEV_MODE
for GHA'skubeapps-main.yml
workflow.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: