You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2020. It is now read-only.
Can we introduce object type as parameter for the find_by_name() ?
Suppose I have a DVS name 'test' and a dv port group with same name 'test' in the same DVS. Then I guess the method will be confused.
networkFolder.find_by_name('test') can return either a DVS or a Dv portgroup ! If we provide the object type then I think we are safe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Can we introduce object type as parameter for the find_by_name() ?
Suppose I have a DVS name 'test' and a dv port group with same name 'test' in the same DVS. Then I guess the method will be confused.
networkFolder.find_by_name('test') can return either a DVS or a Dv portgroup ! If we provide the object type then I think we are safe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: