You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Groups are extremely useful: they make it possible to find one's way in the huge number of existing routes. Still:
they are fairly costly to create and manage;
they sometimes rely on relations that are more or less lists, e.g. the national segments of E* and EV* routes
By adding support for Overpass-defined groups, we could probably avoid the two above issues. Say we remove the national segments from E* and EV* and replace them with careful management of the operator tag in sub-relations; we could create a group of "French sections of EV*" by requesting all sub-relations of routes named "EuroVelo .*" that have the appropriate operator tag (or any other relevant tag).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Groups are extremely useful: they make it possible to find one's way in the huge number of existing routes. Still:
By adding support for Overpass-defined groups, we could probably avoid the two above issues. Say we remove the national segments from E* and EV* and replace them with careful management of the
operator
tag in sub-relations; we could create a group of "French sections of EV*" by requesting all sub-relations of routes named "EuroVelo .*" that have the appropriate operator tag (or any other relevant tag).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: