Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: make VDiff support multi-tenant migrations #16305

Closed
mcrauwel opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #16307
Closed

Feature Request: make VDiff support multi-tenant migrations #16305

mcrauwel opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #16307
Assignees
Labels
Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Milestone

Comments

@mcrauwel
Copy link
Contributor

mcrauwel commented Jul 1, 2024

Feature Description

In #15403 we've implemented multi-tenant migrations and so far this is working very good. We now ran into an issue with vdiff. On one of our multi-tenant workflow we started a VDiff and that is reporting a bunch of extra rows in the target table (the rows from the other tenants outside of this workflow that have already been migrated).

Example:

Table sbtest1:
	State:            pending
	ProcessedRows:    13720191
	MatchingRows:     7720788
	ExtraRowsTarget:  5999403

The workflow definition contains the tenant_id that is being worked on, so vdiff should add a WHERE <tenant_id_field> = <tenant_id> filter clause to the target-side SELECT-query.

      "options": {
        "tenant_id": "123456",
        "strip_sharded_auto_increment": false,
        "shards": []
      }

Use Case(s)

Running vdiff on any multi-tenant migration will be affected by this.

@mcrauwel mcrauwel added Needs Triage This issue needs to be correctly labelled and triaged Type: Feature labels Jul 1, 2024
@mattlord mattlord added Type: Bug and removed Needs Triage This issue needs to be correctly labelled and triaged labels Jul 1, 2024
@mcrauwel
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcrauwel commented Jul 1, 2024

for completeness:

the tenant_id_field is defined in the VSchema:

  "multi_tenant_spec": {
    "tenant_id_column_name": "my_tenant_id_field",
    "tenant_id_column_type": "INT64"
  }

@mattlord mattlord self-assigned this Jul 1, 2024
@mattlord mattlord added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Jul 1, 2024
@mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

mattlord commented Jul 1, 2024

Here's a test case:

git checkout main && make build

pushd examples/local

./101_initial_cluster.sh; mysql < ../common/insert_commerce_data.sql; ./201_customer_tablets.sh; ./202_move_tables.sh; ./203_switch_reads.sh; ./204_switch_writes.sh; ./205_clean_commerce.sh;  ./301_customer_sharded.sh; ./302_new_shards.sh; ./303_reshard.sh; ./304_switch_reads.sh; ./305_switch_writes.sh; ./306_down_shard_0.sh; ./307_delete_shard_0.sh

vtctldclient ApplyVSchema --vschema="$(vtctldclient GetVSchema customer | jq -r '.vindexes += { "unicode_loose_xxhash": {"type": "unicode_loose_xxhash"} }')" customer

vtctldclient ApplyVSchema --vschema="$(vtctldclient GetVSchema customer | jq -r '. += { "multi_tenant_spec": {"tenant_id_column_name": "sku", "tenant_id_column_type": "VARCHAR"} } ')" customer

vtctldclient ApplyVSchema --vschema="$(vtctldclient GetVSchema customer | jq -r '.tables += { "product": { "column_vindexes": [{"column": "sku", "name": "unicode_loose_xxhash"}]} }')" customer

vtctldclient MoveTables --workflow commerce2customer --target-keyspace customer create --source-keyspace commerce --tables "product" --tenant-id='SKU-1001'

sleep 10

mysql customer -e "insert into product values ('SKU-1002', 'stuff', 99)"

vtctldclient vdiff --target-keyspace customer --workflow commerce2customer create

sleep 5 

vtctldclient vdiff --target-keyspace customer --workflow commerce2customer show last

That will show the extra row on the target:

vtctldclient vdiff --target-keyspace customer --workflow commerce2customer show last
VDiff 84655431-4e9d-4854-9826-db01dea88fed scheduled on target shards, use show to view progress

VDiff Summary for customer.commerce2customer (84655431-4e9d-4854-9826-db01dea88fed)
State:        completed
RowsCompared: 2
HasMismatch:  true
StartedAt:    2024-07-01 18:16:45
CompletedAt:  2024-07-01 18:16:45

Table product:
	State:            completed
	ProcessedRows:    2
	MatchingRows:     1
	ExtraRowsTarget:  1

Use "--format=json" for more detailed output.

@deepthi
Copy link
Member

deepthi commented Jul 2, 2024

@mcrauwel as noted in the linked PR, you can in fact run VDiff properly on a tenant-based migration by providing the correct --shards parameter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants