Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support fully concurrent read for raft #997

Open
windshg opened this issue Sep 28, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Support fully concurrent read for raft #997

windshg opened this issue Sep 28, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
community Source: who proposed the issue priority/low-pri Priority: low type/feature req Type: feature request

Comments

@windshg
Copy link

windshg commented Sep 28, 2019

Supporting Fully concurrent read through all replicas for one raft group can improve
reading performance significantly.

@dangleptr
Copy link
Contributor

dangleptr commented Sep 28, 2019

Yes, we could support reading on follower

@jude-zhu jude-zhu added the later label Nov 21, 2019
@CPWstatic CPWstatic added the type/feature req Type: feature request label Aug 27, 2021
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added community Source: who proposed the issue priority/low-pri Priority: low labels Sep 13, 2021
@bjzhaoqing
Copy link

For example in dgraph, follower nodes can serve read requests. In Ludicrous mode, even if the cluster is down, as long as there is a meta node, a graphd node and a storage node, the cluster can still provide read services. Of course, writes will fail. We urgently need this function now.

@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Feb 11, 2022

Dear @bjzhaoqing,
Could you please help create another issue regarding the Ludicrous mode itself, and help us provide more stories on this requirement?

As I understand it correctly, you only need this non-leader readability as a Service degradation instead of concerning about performance.

Thanks!

@wey-gu
Copy link
Contributor

wey-gu commented Feb 18, 2022

Created #3903

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Source: who proposed the issue priority/low-pri Priority: low type/feature req Type: feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants