Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize the fuzzy query of string property #5469

Closed
penghs520 opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Optimize the fuzzy query of string property #5469

penghs520 opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
type/question Type: question about the product

Comments

@penghs520
Copy link

在我百万级节点的图空间中,我使用字符串属性分别进行精准匹配查询和模糊匹配查询,性能相差了近万倍,如图:
image
image

@penghs520 penghs520 added the type/feature req Type: feature request label Apr 3, 2023
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie changed the title 能否优化一下字符串属性的模糊匹配查询 Optimize the fuzzy query of string propety Apr 3, 2023
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie changed the title Optimize the fuzzy query of string propety Optimize the fuzzy query of string property Apr 3, 2023
@QingZ11 QingZ11 added type/question Type: question about the product and removed type/feature req Type: feature request labels Aug 2, 2023
@QingZ11
Copy link
Contributor

QingZ11 commented Sep 18, 2023

Please prefix the two statements with PROFILE to execute and compare the generated execution plans to identify any differences in terms of time consumption.

你可以在这两条语句前面加上 PROFILE 执行下,看下生成的生成计划二者到底哪里耗时有差别。

@QingZ11
Copy link
Contributor

QingZ11 commented Oct 20, 2023

Hi, I have noticed that the issue you created hasn’t been updated for nearly a month, so I have to close it for now. If you have any new updates, you are welcome to reopen this issue anytime.

Thanks a lot for your contribution anyway 😊

这个 issue 超过一个月没有更新内容了,这边先行关闭了。如果你有任何更新的内容,可以再打开这个 issue 哈。

谢谢你的反馈 😊

@QingZ11 QingZ11 closed this as completed Oct 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/question Type: question about the product
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants