Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[dedicated project]BW-tree storage engine (could be used as in-memory storage engine) #3126

Open
Sophie-Xie opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[dedicated project]BW-tree storage engine (could be used as in-memory storage engine) #3126

Sophie-Xie opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@wenhaocs @pengweisong
Labels
type/feature req Type: feature request

Comments

@Sophie-Xie
Copy link
Contributor

from roadmap
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the type/feature req Type: feature request label Oct 18, 2021
@jamieliu1023 jamieliu1023 mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2021
Closed
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie assigned wenhaocs and pengweisong and unassigned critical27 Oct 20, 2021
@jamieliu1023 jamieliu1023 mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2021
Closed
@wenhaocs
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: No good existing storage module supports in memory storage. Most of them are storage services. It's incompatible with the current storage design of Nebula.

Next: research storage module candidates for cloud object storage, including bw-tree, b/b+-tree, Radix tree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wenhaocs wenhaocs

@pengweisong pengweisong

Labels
type/feature req Type: feature request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@critical27 @wenhaocs @Sophie-Xie @pengweisong