You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The master RocksDB has a new enum CompactionReason: kChangeTemperature. If we compile the current nebula code with master rocksdb, it has a warning of not handling kChangeTemperature, and warnings are treated as errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why don't compile with the rocksdb in thrid-party?
For testing purpose. Need to use new features not existing in the version which nebula is using. In addition, the previous code was not a good practice anyway.
Why don't compile with the rocksdb in thrid-party?
For testing purpose. Need to use new features not existing in the version which nebula is using. In addition, the previous code was not a good practice anyway.
This force to handle each enumerate instead of return unknown directly.
Why don't compile with the rocksdb in thrid-party?
For testing purpose. Need to use new features not existing in the version which nebula is using. In addition, the previous code was not a good practice anyway.
This force to handle each enumerate instead of return unknown directly.
I am trying to follow the original logic, where it does return unknown if there is no match. In addition, other functions in the file are doing the same, like flushReasonString, backgroundErrorReasonString, etc.
The master RocksDB has a new enum
CompactionReason: kChangeTemperature
. If we compile the current nebula code with master rocksdb, it has a warning of not handlingkChangeTemperature
, and warnings are treated as errors.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: