Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Geospatial and Benchmark request #1630

Closed
rebootcode opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Geospatial and Benchmark request #1630

rebootcode opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rebootcode
Copy link

The project says lightning fast graph database, what is comparison with? Where is the result?

Any benchmark report against dgraph, neo4j or other graph database like janusgraph, etc.,

Geospatial features are very critical in today's modern application, is there any roadmap for it?

Describe alternatives you've considered
Nebula looks very interesting but it lacks certain features against my current alternative dgraph which has proven performance benchmark.

Additional context
What storage system is used in nebula by default? Is it good for high write or high read? Any uniqueness about storage system used in nebula.

Very curious with the performance and overall comparison with dgraph database.

@amber-moe
Copy link
Contributor

Please help with the geospatial and the benchmark.
@dutor

@CPWstatic
Copy link
Contributor

Please track the geo part with #2595 . And we had give the benchmark in the nebula forums.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants