Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core issue in nebula-cpp #52

Closed
guojun85 opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Core issue in nebula-cpp #52

guojun85 opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
process/fixed Process of bug type/bug Type: something is unexpected

Comments

@guojun85
Copy link

guojun85 commented Sep 10, 2021

randomly core issue, the stack is as follows:

#0  0x00007ff16aff5428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54
#1  0x00007ff16aff702a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2  0x00007ff16afedbd7 in __assert_fail_base (fmt=<optimized out>, assertion=assertion@entry=0x7ff16c6f738c "sp >= tls_stackLimit", 
    file=file@entry=0x7ff16c6f70d8 "/usr/src/third-party/third-party/build/folly/source/folly/detail/MemoryIdler.cpp", line=line@entry=172, 
    function=function@entry=0x7ff16c6f7218 "static void folly::detail::MemoryIdler::unmapUnusedStack(size_t)") at assert.c:92
#3  0x00007ff16afedc82 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7ff16c6f738c "sp >= tls_stackLimit", 
    file=0x7ff16c6f70d8 "/usr/src/third-party/third-party/build/folly/source/folly/detail/MemoryIdler.cpp", line=172, 
    function=0x7ff16c6f7218 "static void folly::detail::MemoryIdler::unmapUnusedStack(size_t)") at assert.c:101
#4  0x00007ff16c36326e in folly::detail::MemoryIdler::unmapUnusedStack(unsigned long) () from libnebula_graph_client.so
#5  0x00007ff16bfa5131 in folly::detail::MemoryIdler::futexWaitPreIdle<std::atomic, std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::_V2::steady_clock, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> > >, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> > > (_ret=@0x7ff01c7902ec: 32753, fut=..., expected=2, deadline=..., 
    waitMask=4294967295, idleTimeout=..., stackToRetain=1024, timeoutVariationFrac=0.5) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/detail/MemoryIdler.h:203
#6  0x00007ff16bfa2452 in folly::detail::MemoryIdler::futexWaitUntil<std::atomic, std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::_V2::steady_clock, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> > >, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> > > (fut=..., expected=2, deadline=..., waitMask=4294967295, idleTimeout=..., 
    stackToRetain=1024, timeoutVariationFrac=0.5) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/detail/MemoryIdler.h:149
#7  0x00007ff16bfa066f in folly::Baton<true, std::atomic>::tryWaitSlow<std::chrono::_V2::steady_clock, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> > > (
    this=0xbc7da70, deadline=..., opt=...) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/synchronization/Baton.h:301
#8  0x00007ff16bfa4253 in folly::Baton<true, std::atomic>::wait (opt=..., this=0xbc7da70) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/synchronization/Baton.h:176
#9  folly::futures::detail::waitImpl<folly::Future<nebula::ExecutionResponse>, nebula::ExecutionResponse> (f=...)
    at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/futures/Future-inl.h:1995
#10 0x00007ff16bfa1ac2 in folly::Future<nebula::ExecutionResponse>::wait() & (this=0x7ff01c790558) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/futures/Future-inl.h:2150
#11 0x00007ff16bf9f7de in folly::Future<nebula::ExecutionResponse>::get() && (this=0x7ff01c790558) at /opt/vesoft/third-party/include/folly/futures/Future-inl.h:2198
#12 0x00007ff16bf9d22d in nebula::Connection::execute (this=0xa708d88, sessionId=56777298, stmt=...)
    at /home/guojun/source/bigo/dfs_nebula-clients/nebula-cpp/src/client/Connection.cpp:92
#13 0x00007ff16bfb89c0 in nebula::Session::execute (this=0xa708d80, stmt=...) at /home/guojun/source/bigo/dfs_nebula-clients/nebula-cpp/src/client/Session.cpp:13
#14 0x0000000000d191a8 in bigo::rec::push::NebulaSessionHolder::execute (this=0xa9245b0, stmt=...)
@dutor
Copy link
Contributor

dutor commented Dec 7, 2022

@Shylock-Hg Any update?

@Shylock-Hg
Copy link
Contributor

Can't reproduce.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
process/fixed Process of bug type/bug Type: something is unexpected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants