Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(typeahead): fix broken typeahead property #5616

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2020

Conversation

daniloff200
Copy link
Contributor

@daniloff200 daniloff200 commented Jan 23, 2020

Rebased from commit after 5.4.0 release

Should fix broken typeahead property, which was found in #5589

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #5616 into development will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #5616   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        52.52%   52.52%           
============================================
  Files                3        3           
  Lines               99       99           
  Branches            17       17           
============================================
  Hits                52       52           
  Misses              37       37           
  Partials            10       10

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 024084b...3622fda. Read the comment docs.

@daniloff200 daniloff200 force-pushed the fix-typeahead-broken-build-5589 branch from 1c1dc1b to 5c74783 Compare January 23, 2020 14:42
valorkin
valorkin previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2020
@dmitry-zhemchugov
Copy link
Contributor

Tested, Ready to merge. Working as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants