Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update rust crate libc to v0.2.169 #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 19, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
libc workspace.dependencies patch 0.2.168 -> 0.2.169

Release Notes

rust-lang/libc (libc)

v0.2.169

Compare Source

Added
  • FreeBSD: add more socket TCP stack constants #​4193
  • Fuchsia: add a sockaddr_vm definition #​4194
Fixed

Breaking: rust-lang/rust#132975 corrected the signedness of core::ffi::c_char on various Tier 2 and Tier 3 platforms (mostly Arm and RISC-V) to match Clang. This release contains the corresponding changes to libc, including the following specific pull requests:

  • ESP-IDF: Replace arch-conditional c_char with a reexport #​4195
  • Fix c_char on various targets #​4199
  • Mirror c_char configuration from rust-lang/rust #​4198
Cleanup
  • Do not re-export c_void in target-specific code #​4200

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit 0da131c into main Dec 19, 2024
26 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/libc-0.x-lockfile branch December 19, 2024 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant