Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small content corrections #399

Closed
wendellpiez opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Small content corrections #399

wendellpiez opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Scope: Content Development of OSCAL content and examples. User Story

Comments

@wendellpiez
Copy link
Contributor

User Story:

Two content corrections are required to catalogs and profiles (see #385):

Rev 4 Catalog

In the rev 4 catalog, where it has (line 1235)

<rlink href="NIST_SP-800-53_rev4_catalog.xml" media-type="application/oscal.metaschema+xml"/>

The media type should be application/oscal.catalog+xml.

Anywhere publication-date is used

Switch the value to a string conformant to an ISO 8601 date-time including Time Zone.

Document this usage in the schema docs until Schematron can be applied to validate it and/or Metaschema can be extended to support xsd:dateTime.

For this element (and check on any/all date elements) the requirement should be a valid ISO 8601 value with time zone expressed.

Goals:

Correct errors or lapses as described above.

Dependencies:

In connection with PR #385, make these changes in the branch wendellpiez:issue166-ref-refactoring, permitting it to be merged.

Then, rebase the later branch issue172-renaming-class-flag over the merged branch.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. We have consensus on handling dates
  2. We have made the changes noted above, and a PR is produced to merge these changes in.
@david-waltermire
Copy link
Contributor

This is complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scope: Content Development of OSCAL content and examples. User Story
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants