You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During our last design review for urbit.org, a number of critiques on the current typographic direction were made:
Scaling of footer typography w/ respect to the overall sizing of the footer needs some balancing
Sizing is huge -> I think h1 should be h2 and so forth.
The typography of a blog post doesn’t feel as good as it used to
It would be good to revisit some of these critiques once we've fully built out all of the requires pages such that we have parity with the old urbit.org site, this way, typographic changes can be assessed against the entirety of the site's content.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During our last design review for urbit.org, a number of critiques on the current typographic direction were made:
It would be good to revisit some of these critiques once we've fully built out all of the requires pages such that we have parity with the old urbit.org site, this way, typographic changes can be assessed against the entirety of the site's content.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: