Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

list-unicodeset: document Unicode version syntax #983

Open
markusicu opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

list-unicodeset: document Unicode version syntax #983

markusicu opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@markusicu
Copy link
Member

I was just trying to use the list-unicodeset utility with the set of new-in-Unicode 17 characters in issue #982. The utility is still on Unicode 16, so then I tried to group characters by U17:gc guessing & hoping that that would show the draft values. No effect.

The help page does not mention the versioned-property syntax: https://unicode-org.github.io/unicodetools/help/list-unicodeset

Could someone please document that?

@eggrobin @macchiati

@eggrobin eggrobin self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@eggrobin
Copy link
Member

eggrobin commented Dec 4, 2024

I tried to group characters by U17:gc guessing & hoping that that would show the draft values. No effect.

The tools haven’t been pushed since shortly after the 16.0 release, so you’re unlikely to see anything. U17dev: should work.

Could someone please document that?

My plan is to stick that in the forthcoming UnicodeSet spec (as an extension; obviously I don’t want to require ICU to support that, but we should make sure it is reserved so that it is either an error or means what it does in the tools, and the notation could come in handy when talking about properties).

In the meantime, there is this thing: https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/blob/8459b0b27f09eeec411252d214cb7e2fd47fdd45/docs/help/changes.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants