Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ConfusionMatrix incorrect? #12586

Closed
2 tasks done
GilSeamas opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

ConfusionMatrix incorrect? #12586

GilSeamas opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon

Comments

@GilSeamas
Copy link

Search before asking

  • I have searched the YOLOv5 issues and found no similar bug report.

YOLOv5 Component

Validation

Bug

I believe there is a problem in the ConfusionMatrix() method. It only counts the false positives if there are true positives.

n = matches.shape[0] > 0
m0, m1, _ = matches.transpose().astype(int)
for i, gc in enumerate(gt_classes):
j = m0 == i
if n and sum(j) == 1:
self.matrix[detection_classes[m1[j]], gc] += 1 # correct
else:
self.matrix[self.nc, gc] += 1 # true background

if n:
for i, dc in enumerate(detection_classes):
if not any(m1 == i):
self.matrix[dc, self.nc] += 1 # predicted background

I believe it should be:

n = matches.shape[0] > 0
m0, m1, _ = matches.transpose().astype(int)
for i, gc in enumerate(gt_classes):
j = m0 == i
if n and sum(j) == 1:
self.matrix[detection_classes[m1[j]], gc] += 1 # correct
else:
self.matrix[self.nc, gc] += 1 # true background

#NO IF STATEMENT HERE
for i, dc in enumerate(detection_classes):
if not any(m1 == i):
self.matrix[dc, self.nc] += 1 # predicted background

Environment

No response

Minimal Reproducible Example

n = matches.shape[0] > 0
m0, m1, _ = matches.transpose().astype(int)
for i, gc in enumerate(gt_classes):
j = m0 == i
if n and sum(j) == 1:
self.matrix[detection_classes[m1[j]], gc] += 1 # correct
else:
self.matrix[self.nc, gc] += 1 # true background

if n:
for i, dc in enumerate(detection_classes):
if not any(m1 == i):
self.matrix[dc, self.nc] += 1 # predicted background

Additional

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I'd like to help by submitting a PR!
@GilSeamas GilSeamas added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2024

👋 Hello @GilSeamas, thank you for your interest in YOLOv5 🚀! Please visit our ⭐️ Tutorials to get started, where you can find quickstart guides for simple tasks like Custom Data Training all the way to advanced concepts like Hyperparameter Evolution.

If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide a minimum reproducible example to help us debug it.

If this is a custom training ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset image examples and training logs, and verify you are following our Tips for Best Training Results.

Requirements

Python>=3.8.0 with all requirements.txt installed including PyTorch>=1.8. To get started:

git clone https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5  # clone
cd yolov5
pip install -r requirements.txt  # install

Environments

YOLOv5 may be run in any of the following up-to-date verified environments (with all dependencies including CUDA/CUDNN, Python and PyTorch preinstalled):

Status

YOLOv5 CI

If this badge is green, all YOLOv5 GitHub Actions Continuous Integration (CI) tests are currently passing. CI tests verify correct operation of YOLOv5 training, validation, inference, export and benchmarks on macOS, Windows, and Ubuntu every 24 hours and on every commit.

Introducing YOLOv8 🚀

We're excited to announce the launch of our latest state-of-the-art (SOTA) object detection model for 2023 - YOLOv8 🚀!

Designed to be fast, accurate, and easy to use, YOLOv8 is an ideal choice for a wide range of object detection, image segmentation and image classification tasks. With YOLOv8, you'll be able to quickly and accurately detect objects in real-time, streamline your workflows, and achieve new levels of accuracy in your projects.

Check out our YOLOv8 Docs for details and get started with:

pip install ultralytics

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@GilSeamas hello! Thank you for bringing this to our attention and for your willingness to help by submitting a PR. It's great to see community members actively participating in improving YOLOv5.

From your description, it seems you've identified a potential issue with the way false positives are counted in the ConfusionMatrix() method. Your observation about the conditional structure that might prevent counting false positives when there are no true positives is insightful.

Before proceeding with a PR, it would be beneficial to verify this behavior with a controlled test case to ensure that the proposed change resolves the issue without introducing any new ones. If you could create a minimal reproducible example that demonstrates the problem and confirms that your suggested fix works, that would be fantastic.

Once you have this, please go ahead and submit a PR with the changes and the test case. We'll review it as soon as possible. Your contribution is much appreciated! 🚀

If you need guidance on creating a PR or on how to write the test case, please refer to our documentation at https://docs.ultralytics.com/yolov5/.

Thanks again for your support and for being an active member of the YOLOv5 community! 😊

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2024

👋 Hello there! We wanted to give you a friendly reminder that this issue has not had any recent activity and may be closed soon, but don't worry - you can always reopen it if needed. If you still have any questions or concerns, please feel free to let us know how we can help.

For additional resources and information, please see the links below:

Feel free to inform us of any other issues you discover or feature requests that come to mind in the future. Pull Requests (PRs) are also always welcomed!

Thank you for your contributions to YOLO 🚀 and Vision AI ⭐

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon label Feb 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Stale Stale and schedule for closing soon
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants