Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update autolabel_issue.py #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

Update autolabel_issue.py #141

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher commented Jul 22, 2024

πŸ› οΈ PR Summary

Made with ❀️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Enhanced the autolabel_issue.py script to improve the automatic labeling process for GitHub issues and pull requests.

πŸ“Š Key Changes

  • Updated the prompt used to select relevant labels for GitHub issues and PRs.
  • Added detailed instructions for reviewing and selecting labels.
  • Included a step to ensure only label names are provided in the response.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • Improved Accuracy: Provides clearer guidelines for selecting the most appropriate labels, ensuring better categorization of issues and PRs. 🏷️
  • Simplified Process: Streamlines the response format, making it easier to automate and understand. πŸš€
  • Better Organization: Helps maintainers and contributors quickly identify and address relevant issues and pull requests. πŸ“‚

@UltralyticsAssistant UltralyticsAssistant added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 22, 2024
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher merged commit 4841e8a into main Jul 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher deleted the glenn-jocher-patch-1 branch July 22, 2024 23:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants