-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Jupiter] Create indexing functionality to ERA Thesis "Department" and "Supervisor" fields #1002
Comments
As discussed with @abombak These fields are currently indexed, and items can be located with an exact search. Issues are with the inconsistency of the data in these fields.
What needs to be discussed:
Note this function is for advanced users only - can we allow search within certain fields with a search syntax to define the search scope? |
@ERAHelp and @weiweishi - will create a report and share. |
For example with department: jupiter/app/views/items/_thesis_more_information.html.erb Lines 45 to 58 in e797c4f
and this would generate the link: search_link_for(@item, :departments, facet: :search, value: department)
(This is rough, might be a little more complicated to get this right) |
Based on a conversation with @abombak, adding the search links for Department and Supervisor addresses the pressing need. It would still be good to consider adding Department facet specifically for the theses collection. But this would be a nice-to-have feature. |
The way this is handled for other attributes is with 'facet' behaviour. We could make these 'facets' and reindex. (See #1060) Is there any appetite for an advanced search like behaviour? Right now the search created for the link is just executed exactly as is with the solr field flowing all the way through. I was thinking of adding logic to interpret/validate |
@pgwillia |
Being able to search for UA theses by the Department granting the degree and the Supervisor(s) who supervised the thesis has been repeatedly requested by our users over the years, and will add a lot of usability to our records (this a a popular search field in other Thesis databases such as Proquest Dissertation Abstracts).
Leah has stated that she would like this functionality added during the next Sprint if possible, with the understanding from prior discussion that it may be a fairly easily added feature.
Anna
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: