Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix EasyCLA build process error #11

Open
brianorwhatever opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Fix EasyCLA build process error #11

brianorwhatever opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@brianorwhatever
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like the github pages build fails with EasyCLA problems 😞

I'm not sure how to resolve this issue

@kordwarshuis
Copy link
Contributor

@m00sey
Copy link
Contributor

m00sey commented May 30, 2024

I'll take a look.

@henkvancann
Copy link
Contributor

Does this info help? https://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/HOME/EasyCLA+onboarding (via @darrellodonnell )
Yes, it did for me. Had to sign a document and then all signs green.

@m00sey
Copy link
Contributor

m00sey commented May 30, 2024

I've added a branch protection rule allowing force pushes to the gh-pages branch, so the workflow should be fine now.

@brianorwhatever
Copy link
Contributor Author

@m00sey excellent, let's give it a try by merging in #9

@darrellodonnell
Copy link
Collaborator

I've added a branch protection rule allowing force pushes to the gh-pages branch, so the workflow should be fine now.

Have we documented what is required here (i.e. how to reproduce the proper setup)?

@brianorwhatever
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like this worked and is a valid path forward to resolve the EasyCLA / gh-pages issues we've encountered. Just needs to be documented so it can be reproduced the next time this crops up

@m00sey
Copy link
Contributor

m00sey commented May 31, 2024

needs to be part of new repository set up, yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants