Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added rtl8812au drivers #452

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

added rtl8812au drivers #452

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kimocoder
Copy link

  • added rtl8812au drivers to staging

@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @kimocoder!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

  • Kernel Newbies - this website contains a lot of useful resources for new kernel developers.
  • If you'd like a step-by-step, challenge-based introduction to kernel development, the Eudyptula Challenge would be an excellent start.
  • The kernel documentation - see also the Documentation directory in the kernel tree.

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

lopsided98 pushed a commit to lopsided98/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2019
lkl tools: lklfuse: add read-only option in help
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2020
rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a35 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
torvalds pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2020
rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a35 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
heftig pushed a commit to zen-kernel/zen-kernel that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2020
commit db6a501 upstream.

rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a35 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mansr pushed a commit to victronenergy/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2020
commit db6a501 upstream.

rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a35 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
ruscur pushed a commit to ruscur/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2020
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
torvalds#12:
Save 2 atomic ops, 1 allocation, 1 free per open/read/close sequence for such

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#163: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:536:
+	if (pde->proc_ops->proc_flags & PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT) {
+		pde->flags |= PROC_ENTRY_PERMANENT;
+	}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#203: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:676:
+			WARN(1, "removing permanent /proc entry '%s'", de->name);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#207: FILE: fs/proc/generic.c:680:
+			if (S_ISDIR(de->mode)) {
+				parent->nlink--;
+			}

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#244: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:198:
+static loff_t pde_lseek(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#274: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:222:
+static ssize_t pde_read(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#303: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:246:
+static ssize_t pde_write(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#332: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:270:
+static __poll_t pde_poll(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#361: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:294:
+static long pde_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#391: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:319:
+static long pde_compat_ioctl(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#421: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:343:
+static int pde_mmap(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#452: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:368:
+pde_get_unmapped_area(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct file *file, unsigned long orig_addr,

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#489: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:393:
+		return pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
torvalds#491: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:395:
+		rv = pde_get_unmapped_area(pde, file, orig_addr, len, pgoff, flags);

WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
torvalds#518: FILE: fs/proc/inode.c:470:
+		if (release) {
+			return release(inode, file);
+		}

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 462 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

./patches/proc-faster-open-read-close-with-permanent-files.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches

Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
jackpot51 pushed a commit to pop-os/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867677

commit db6a501 upstream.

rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.

This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
|  #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 torvalds#450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
|  #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
|  #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
|  #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty torvalds#452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
|  dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
|  ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
|  lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
|  sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
|  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
|  process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
|  worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
|  kthread+0x108/0x140
|  ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
|  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
|  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Fixes: 7e81a35 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <[email protected]>
sodar pushed a commit to sodar/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2021
plbossart pushed a commit to plbossart/sound that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2021
Fixed following WARNINGs:
for torvalds#355, removed this unnecessary log print.
for torvalds#364, added a variable to "struct es8316_priv", and tried to let
          function es8316_enable_jack_detect() align to mainline code.
for torvalds#452, removed it since we did not verified the patch on other platform.

	WARNING: Unnecessary ftrace-like logging - prefer using ftrace
	torvalds#355: FILE: sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c:751:
	+    dev_dbg(comp->dev, "Exit %s\n", __func__);

	ERROR: do not initialise statics to 0
	torvalds#364: FILE: sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c:760:
	+    static int initial = 0;

	WARNING: DT compatible string "everest,es8336" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
	torvalds#452: FILE: sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c:932:
	+    { .compatible = "everest,es8336", },

Signed-off-by: Huajun Li <[email protected]>
staging-kernelci-org pushed a commit to kernelci/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
commit c35559f ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
arm64 and RISC-V), that are implementing equivalent support for shadow
stacks, might need to add support for it.

Independent of that, reserving arch-specific syscall numbers in the
syscall tables of all architectures is good practice and would help
avoid future conflicts. map_shadow_stack() is marked as a conditional
syscall in sys_ni.c. Adding it to the syscall tables of other
architectures is harmless and would return ENOSYS when exercised.

Note, map_shadow_stack() was assigned #453 during the merge process
since torvalds#452 was taken by fchmodat2().

For Powerpc, map it to sys_ni_syscall() as is the norm for Powerpc
syscall tables.

For Alpha, map_shadow_stack() takes up torvalds#563 as Alpha still diverges from
the common syscall numbering system in the other architectures.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> (powerpc)
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants