Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Whats the status of this? #282

Open
eabase opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Whats the status of this? #282

eabase opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@eabase
Copy link

eabase commented Mar 4, 2023

It seem that the proposal has been in the pipeline for a year now.
What is preventing progress and why is it taking so long?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9147/
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec

PS. Can this proposal be considered as de-facto?

@kaduk
Copy link
Contributor

kaduk commented Mar 4, 2023

This repository holds the markdown sources that were used to produce RFC 9147. The RFC is authoritative.
I'm not entirely sure what you think is a "proposal" in this repository, but I think you should use the published RFC for whatever you need a reference for.

@eabase
Copy link
Author

eabase commented Mar 5, 2023

Hi @kaduk
Thanks for rapid reply. I found this repo from the first RFC link above, where it says that this RFC is:

"RFC - Proposed Standard (April 2022)".

IDK what to make of that, or what it means exactly?
Also the attached emails raises some questions, but it's unclear if they were addressed.

@kaduk
Copy link
Contributor

kaduk commented Mar 5, 2023

Proposed Standard is a stage in the Internet Standards process, which is described in BCP 9; BCP 9 currently comprises eight individual RFCs with subsequent ones often modifying aspects of earlier ones. Perhaps the most interesting ones for your immediate question would be RFCs 7127 and 6410.

@eabase
Copy link
Author

eabase commented Mar 8, 2023

Thanks @kaduk
But that only describe the bureaucracy, whereas I am trying to determine the actual state of the proposal. Looking for a de-facto standard that developers can start working with.

@seanturner
Copy link
Contributor

seanturner commented Mar 8, 2023

I believe the contents of this repo are the same as RFC 9147 with the exception of the status of this memo. See link. So in that sense, developers can start working with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants