You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm one of the new maintainers assigned to this project. I propose we introduce a dev branch so that it's easier to iterate and ensure master is always deployable to npm. This lets us test new features and changes for a while before incrementing package.json's semantic versioning (As well as making it easier to maintain a changelog).
This would also allow us to start updating and merging old pull requests such as #35 without waiting on the original authors to come back. That way we can make a lot of progress towards reaching 0 issues and pull requests (Since people get discouraged to write a fix if they see a lot of existing pull requests, thinking it wouldn't get merged).
What are other peoples take on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey! Glad to see you. As to the dev branch, I don't think it's entirely needed. Most projects have master as cutting edge and include tags to npm deployments.
I'm one of the new maintainers assigned to this project. I propose we introduce a dev branch so that it's easier to iterate and ensure master is always deployable to npm. This lets us test new features and changes for a while before incrementing package.json's semantic versioning (As well as making it easier to maintain a changelog).
This would also allow us to start updating and merging old pull requests such as #35 without waiting on the original authors to come back. That way we can make a lot of progress towards reaching 0 issues and pull requests (Since people get discouraged to write a fix if they see a lot of existing pull requests, thinking it wouldn't get merged).
What are other peoples take on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: