-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
🚀 Deployed on https://deploy-preview-997--etna-docs.netlify.app |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #997 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.82% 85.74% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 162 162
Lines 8605 8614 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 7385 7386 +1
- Misses 1220 1228 +8
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
dataset_freq: | ||
Frequency of the dataset. | ||
path: | ||
Path to save the file with model. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add Raises block please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
add |
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB julia-shenshina commented on 2022-11-22T15:39:15Z why do we need this plot? as I can see, it is not connected with false-positive statement because there are no intersections over segments 🤔 alex-hse-repository commented on 2022-11-22T16:37:53Z What do you mean? These are the segments with the good metrics which were predicted to be bad(so false positives). Table above(metrics.tail(10)) shows metrics for these segments |
What do you mean? These are the segments with the good metrics which were predicted to be bad(so false positives). Table above(metrics.tail(10)) shows metrics for these segments View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
Before submitting (must do checklist)
Proposed Changes
Closing issues