Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trimmomatic reverse reads not improve #16

Open
salehsereshki opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Trimmomatic reverse reads not improve #16

salehsereshki opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@salehsereshki
Copy link

I have bisulfite sequencing reads for 6 samples. At first I used fastQC to check the quality of the reads. I found lots of Illumina universal adapters in my reads. Then I used trimmomatic paired-end to trim these overrepresented sequences. After trimming with the trimmomatic, the quality of the forward reads improved but reverse reads still are terrible. Actually, there were overrepresented sequences in both forward and reverse reads before trimming. After trimming, the forward reads do not have those over-represented sequences, but the reverse reads still have them.

java -jar trimmomatic-0.39.jar PE -threads 12 PV6N-3_S35_L004_R1_001.fastq.gz PV6N-3_S35_L004_R2_001.fastq.gz pv6n_3_output_forward_paired3.fq.gz pv6n_3_output_forward_unpaired3.fq.gz pv6n_3_output_reverse_paired3.fq.gz pv6n_3_output_reverse_unpaired3.fq.gz ILLUMINACLIP:sequence_adaptors.fasta:2:30:10:2:keepBothReads

This is my command. Almost 20 percents of the reverse reads contain over-represented sequences.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant