-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
schedulers: skip uniform store to reduce schedule #5286
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5286 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.59% 75.61% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 312 312
Lines 31054 31064 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 23476 23490 +14
- Misses 5563 5564 +1
+ Partials 2015 2010 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rest LGTM
hotSchedulerResultCounter.WithLabelValues("skip-uniform-store", strconv.FormatUint(bs.cur.dstStore.GetID(), 10)).Inc() | ||
tryUpdateBestSolution := func() { | ||
if label, ok := bs.filterUniformStore(); ok { | ||
schedulerCounter.WithLabelValues(bs.sche.GetName(), fmt.Sprintf("%s-skip-%s-uniform-store", bs.rwTy.String(), label)).Inc() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not still using hotSchedulerResultCounter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous monitor location is wrong
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 8e652c5
|
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
/merge |
@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 70315e8
|
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Ref #4949
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note