-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zephyr: enable HIFI_SHARING if DP scheduler is enabled with HIFI #9644
Open
kv2019i
wants to merge
1
commit into
thesofproject:main
Choose a base branch
from
kv2019i:202411-hifi-sharing-enable
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why
imply
and notselect
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lyakh imply leaves it possible to turn it off https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/build/kconfig/tips.html#the-imply-statement . I guess this is up to debata, but sharing does have a perf impact and if you don't you hifi in DP modules, then you strictly speaking don't need this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kv2019i yeah, but disabling it is rather dangerous, isn't it. I'm wondering if we could automate this. Compile-time checking could be done at some primitive level, I suppose, like if DP modules are enabled and they use HiFi, but that's too broad - would trigger almost always. We probably want to only turn on HiFi context saving when a DP thread is started, that uses HiFi. Can we add that to the DP scheduler as a DP HiFi use-count?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lyakh but with loadable modules (potentially out of tree), this won't be enough, right? There was discussion with the Zephyr PR on the option to make the context save on-demand. I.e. take an exception on hifi use and mark a bit for the thread context. This would add some cost to the common case (e.g. typical LL execution with no preemption of threads between LL tasks).
I think this is now a product policy call and basicly with this PR, you have to go out of your way to disable this on SOF. But given this was disabled before, this construct using "imply" at least allows to revert to that older policy in case anyone needs. If we'd use select, that would lock the policy with no per-target way out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kv2019i would it be valid to write
? But well, yes, there's always a way to break things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lyakh Yes, that could be done as well, the second imply would have to be under some other Kconfig option that is picked by all SOF targets.
That would make it impossible to use the current workarounds:
This certainly should not be the default, but whether it's allowed at all, that's a good question.