We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, it is too easy to pass the wrong config in when creating a simulation because of this interface
export interface SimulationOptions { options?: Record<string, unknown>;
The code below will type check even though clientId is cased incorrectly
clientId
createSimulation(simulator: "auth0", options: { options:{ clientId: "[your client-id]"
This codesandbox was a quick spike for one way this could be significantly improved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently, it is too easy to pass the wrong config in when creating a simulation because of this interface
The code below will type check even though
clientId
is cased incorrectlyThis codesandbox was a quick spike for one way this could be significantly improved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: