Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDN endpoint: Test for Premium_Verizon, optional values fix #9902

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 27, 2020

Conversation

AliAllomani
Copy link
Contributor

@AliAllomani AliAllomani commented Dec 16, 2020

  • Added test for "Premium_Verizon" SKU for azurerm_cdn_profile
  • Assigning the parameters EndpointProperties.ContentTypesToCompress, EndpointProperties.GeoFilters only when values are set for content_types_to_compress, geo_filter.
  • Assigning the parameter EndpointProperties.DeliveryPolicy only when SKU set to Microsoft_Standard.

Fixes #9895

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Dec 16, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @AliAllomani - Aside from two questions i have left inline this looks good! Once those are addressed this should be good to merge

contentTypes := flattenAzureRMCdnEndpointContentTypes(props.ContentTypesToCompress)
if err := d.Set("content_types_to_compress", contentTypes); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Error setting `content_types_to_compress`: %+v", err)
if _, ok := d.GetOk("content_types_to_compress"); ok {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need this check? or does the API return a default value?

geoFilters := flattenCdnEndpointGeoFilters(props.GeoFilters)
if err := d.Set("geo_filter", geoFilters); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Error setting `geo_filter`: %+v", err)
if _, ok := d.GetOk("geo_filter"); ok {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need this check? or does the API return a default value?

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Dec 27, 2020

Additionally these tests are failing:

TestAccCdnEndpoint_deliveryRule
TestAccCdnEndpoint_globalDeliveryRule
TestAccCdnEndpoint_withGeoFilters

@AliAllomani
Copy link
Contributor Author

AliAllomani commented Dec 27, 2020

@katbyte Thank you for your review

Updated and passed acceptance tests

--- PASS: TestAccCdnEndpoint_withGeoFilters (470.36s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/cdn	472.676s

--- PASS: TestAccCdnEndpoint_deliveryRule (633.33s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/cdn	635.827s

--- PASS: TestAccCdnEndpoint_PremiumVerizon (708.57s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/cdn	710.972s

--- PASS: TestAccCdnEndpoint_globalDeliveryRule (581.30s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/cdn	586.211s

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Dec 27, 2020
@AliAllomani AliAllomani requested a review from katbyte December 27, 2020 21:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @AliAllomani! - this LGTM now 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit b996893 into hashicorp:master Dec 27, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 8, 2021

This has been released in version 2.42.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.42.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 27, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error 400 creating Azure Premium CDN endpoint
2 participants