Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Exposing VPA to GA module #1404

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 19, 2022

Conversation

ericyz
Copy link
Collaborator

@ericyz ericyz commented Sep 19, 2022

The vertical pod scaling has been availble in the GA Terraform Provider. This change will expose the feature in the existing GA module.

@ericyz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ericyz commented Sep 30, 2022

Please review @bharathkkb @Jberlinsky

@ericyz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ericyz commented Oct 3, 2022

Hi @bharathkkb @Jberlinsky , could you please review at your convenience?

Copy link
Member

@bharathkkb bharathkkb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay @ericyz. Just so I understand this correctly based on the PR contents, we are not adding the VPA feature but rather just exposing the output in GA modules. In the future, adding a PR description would be great so it is easier for us to correlate the intention behind the PR with the code changes.

@ericyz ericyz changed the title Feat/vpa fix: Exposing VPA to GA module Oct 7, 2022
@ericyz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ericyz commented Oct 7, 2022

@bharathkkb - thanks for getting back. Yes, agree and I'll add the description in more details in future.

@comment-bot-dev
Copy link

@ericyz
Thanks for the PR! 🚀
✅ Lint checks have passed.

@bharathkkb bharathkkb merged commit df16cda into terraform-google-modules:master Oct 19, 2022
CPL-markus pushed a commit to WALTER-GROUP/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
feat: move vpa out of beta

Co-authored-by: Bharath KKB <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants